top of page
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter

Why direct football will always have a place in the Premier League

Feb 8, 2024

26

 


Diego Simeone is someone who always expresses exactly how he feels. “You see English football now and the matches finish 4-4, 5-3, 6-2, or 5-1,” said the Atletico Madrid head coach in November. “These are all games that are fun to watch, but nobody is defending!”

Unnecessarily provocative? Yes. Does he have a point? Also yes.

Among Europe’s big five leagues, only the Bundesliga (3.19) is close to matching the Premier League’s goals per game rate (3.20) this season, though the German top-flight is regularly Europe’s highest-scoring major league, owing to the homogeneity of pressing and the high volume of counter-attacks. Last season was the highest-scoring in Premier League’s 20-team era history at 2.85 goals per game but even in that context, this season’s increase is stark.



Simeone’s Atletico have been the most successful defence-first team of recent years. They have come up against five of the Premier League’s ‘Big Six’ in European competition (they are yet to play Tottenham Hotspur), and have eliminated four of them, primarily with an aggressive 4-4-2.

Atletico knocked out Liverpool in 2019-20 and Manchester United in 2021-22, both in the Champions League round of 16. They knocked out Arsenal in the Europa League semi-finals in 2017-18 on their way to lifting the trophy and overcame Chelsea in the Champions League last four in 2013-14.




Manchester City are the only team Simeone has not beaten from England’s elite, but he did beat Pep Guardiola’s Bayern Munich in the Champions League semi-finals (on away goals) in 2015-16 and has never lost to the Spaniard by more than one goal.

Guardiola’s arrival in Manchester in 2016 was a turning point for the Premier League becoming a passing league. City are on track to become the first team to win the league with a pass completion over 90 per cent. In 2009-10, Chelsea and Arsenal, who finished first and third, were the only teams with a rate higher than 80 per cent.


“When we arrived (2013, at Southampton), it was difficult to find two or three teams playing in the same kind of style,” Mauricio Pochettino told Alan Shearer. “Now it’s like all teams try to build from the back, try to press high. It’s like it was contagious. I don’t say this is wrong, but I think it’s too much sometimes. I preferred it in the past when it was different coaches, different ways of playing.”

Charles Reep, a trailblazer of performance analysis in England, published a 1968 paper entitled ‘Skill and Chance in Association Football’. This inspired Charles Hughes, who became FA technical director in 1983 and instilled a playing philosophy of long balls and physical defending, rooted in key findings from Reep’s paper:

  • 10 per cent of shots were scored

  • Half of goals were scored from zero or one passes

  • 80 per cent of goals were scored from fewer than 4 passes

  • 50 per cent of goals came from regains in the opposition half




Later, some parts were validated, namely the overall shot conversion rate, while others were recontextualised. Importantly, the high proportion of goals from low passing sequences was just a reflection of more of those sequences occurring. The percentage of longer passing sequences that ended in goals was roughly the same.



Reep and Hughes were not in the nation’s thoughts when the FA launched the ‘England DNA’ initiative in 2014. This was, and is, a coaching and tactical framework for all England teams, “aimed at building possession domination” and wanted to develop future England players with “outstanding technical and tactical abilities”. Dan Ashworth, the FA director of elite development at the time, stressed that it would be remiss not to look at some of the lessons other countries have provided.

Undoubtedly the Dutch total football approach of Rinus Michels and Johan Cruyff were sources of inspiration. The same can be said for Guardiola’s Barcelona and the pass-mastery of 2008-2012 Spain which won them two European Championships and the World Cup. Plenty of coaches and players from those teams are now involved in management themselves.

The upshot? Possession and positional play football has become so common that direct, counter-attacking and defence-first approaches have never been more appropriate. Counter-attacks hit a five-year high in the Premier League last season.





Since 2018-19, 65 per cent of goals have come from sequences of fewer than three passes, and just 9.4 per cent from sequences of 10+ passes. Play style is way more than just goalscoring, often more about control, but there is an increasing elitism around possession and positional play-led coaches, who often come unstuck most against counter-attacking sides.

Take Guardiola’s City. In seven full seasons, a team has done the double over them (beat City home and away) only five times. All five were direct, counter-attacking sides with strong defensive bases, often playing a back-five. Antonio Conte did it twice, with Chelsea in 2016-17 and Spurs in 2021-22, with Chelsea’s 3-1 win at the Etihad in December 2016 remaining one of the greatest counter-attacking Premier League displays of modern times.



Nuno Espirito Santos’ Wolves and Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s Manchester United — two of the best counter-attacking sides in recent league history — both managed it in 2019-20, while Brentford did it last season, winning 2-1 away and 1-0 at home, albeit on the final day when City were thinking of upcoming finals in the FA Cup and Champions League. Against ‘Big Six’ opponents, Thomas Frank switches from 4-3-3 to 3-5-2 and plays particularly directly.


“We struggled a lot with their long balls, and they didn’t have many sequences of passes,” said Guardiola after the Brentford defeat at the Etihad in November 2022. “It was direct with (David) Raya the ’keeper playing balls to the striker. (Ivan) Toney flicked the ball on, and we always had problems behind and in front of our defence.”

“When they lost the ball, they were always behind it. That’s why we couldn’t find our rhythm. They defended really well, with three central defenders and three holding midfielders.”


There is no simple way teams can avoid playing against this type of opponent. Against positional play and high possession teams, teams can set traps and press from triggers to try to prevent them from accessing a certain player or funnel play into a specific area.

For instance, Arsenal’s open-play attacking problems this season are rooted in opponents doubling up on their wingers and defending with back fives, an unsurprising approach given Bukayo Saka and Gabriel Martinellini were involved in over 50 per cent of league goals last season.

In 2022-23, Arsenal dropped more points away to bottom-half teams than top-half ones, fittingly handing City the title with a defeat away to Nottingham Forest. Arsenal had 81 per cent possession but failed to register a big chance and Forest won the game with a goal from a counter-attack. Aside from having even more possession, nothing can be done to prevent a team from playing directly — inferior sides that do the best against ‘Big Six’ clubs bring them down to their level, not try to play up, regardless of how ‘brave’ some might think that is.

Roberto De Zerbi’s Brighton & Hove Albion have especially suffered when opponents sit off and refuse to be baited into the press that Brighton want them to start so they can play their central passing patterns through the lines.



Humbling defeats this season to West Ham (3-1), Aston Villa (6-1), Luton Town (4-0), and Everton last season (5-1), followed the same pattern: Brighton concede early, fail to penetrate a stubborn defence, get nowhere with crosses and then get hit on the break, with their overly-expansive shape ripe for counter-attacking.




Tactically, the 3-5-2 makes sense for any low-budget Premier League team. Most big sides play a back four, so a strike partnership in a 3-5-2 leaves a two-v-two against centre-backs. High defensive lines are common, easily exploited through flick-ons and ideal for flying wing-backs to run beyond. Out-of-possession, a 5-3-2 packs bodies centrally, denying space and midfield overloads. Against single No 9 systems — which is most of the league — it allows one centre-back to man-mark without compromising the structure.

Wolves showed how to do it when they beat City 2-1 in September. Left centre-back Toti Gomes man-marked Phil Foden, and Wolves still had Craig Dawson and Maximilian Kilman two-v-one against Erling Haaland. They also filled the right side of their block, closing space where Haaland wanted to make channel runs.

 

Sheffield United had success under Chris Wilder with an unconventional 3-5-2 in 2019-20. Their overlapping centre-backs caused opponents all sorts of problems, but they also had the second-best defence, and were seventh, when the season was paused due to the pandemic. Nuno’s Wolves, meanwhile, achieved consecutive seventh-placed finishes after promotion and reached the Europa League quarter-finals while adopting that formation.

Luton, who climbed out of the relegation zone last week for the first time since November, are further proof. They were heavy favourites to go straight back down, but Rob Edwards has mixed between a 3-4-2-1 and 3-5-2 and balanced high pressing with a low block. At home, they have faced seven of the current top eight, and their overall record is competitive: three wins, two draws and five losses, all by a single goal.

Luton have attempted the most crosses in the league and their aggressive pressing caused Brighton to self-destruct last week. As their 4-4 draw at Newcastle demonstrated, they have the best survival chances of the promoted trio, with Burnley and Sheffield United increasingly adrift in 19th and 20th.

Burnley are a fascinating case study. They survived five Premier League seasons, with two top-half finishes and a record seventh-place in 2017-18, which earned them European football. Then they stagnated, as others around them evolved, and sacked Sean Dyche before they slipped into the Championship. Under Vincent Kompany, Guardiola’s former City captain, they have been much more expansive, high-pressing and ball-dominant. That style won them the Championship — the first team to do so with 100+ points since Leicester City in 2013-14 — but 11 of their 16 league losses this season have been by two or more goals.



The lack of an endgame with this approach seems to dissuade head coaches and clubs. Leicester’s 2015-16 Premier League title was largely a victory for counter-attacking football but remains the exception to the rule. As romantic as it was, they benefited from the ‘Big Six’ having poor seasons — Leicester’s 81 points is the sixth-fewest by a title winner, with the average since 2016-17 being 94 points.




Simeone’s Atletico have twice won La Liga (2013-14 and 2020-21), though he is the only recent head coach to have such longevity, in charge since December 2011, while playing this way. It speaks volumes that for all his success — multiple league titles and cups, both domestic and European — neither of Spain’s biggest two clubs nor a Premier League side have poached him.

Nuno was sacked from Wolves after finishing 13th in 2020-21, after 199 games, and only managed 17 at Spurs. For better or worse, Europe’s most elite want to win while dominating the ball.

Direct football isn’t the way teams win titles, and it undoubtedly has a shorter shelf life than ball-dominant styles. But given how wide the gap between the Premier League and Championship is, investing in a strong defence and embracing direct/counter-attacking play makes increasingly good sense, even if it is akin to Brentford’s hybrid model, where they specifically employ the tactic against the top teams.

Without going full Charles Reep, being open-minded and innovative sometimes means doing something the old-fashioned way.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

1 Comment


Really thoughtful piece — I like how it highlights that direct football, despite being labeled old-fashioned, still has a place in today’s Premier League. It’s similar to how in academics, different approaches work for different students. For example, some prefer modern, analytical methods while others rely on more traditional support nursing assignment writers uk to help them simplify complex topics. At the end of the day, it’s about using the strategy that gets results, whether on the pitch or in the classroom.

Like

The AI Football Coach Educator Pathway

A structured route for Coach Educators and Coach Developers  in Clubs and Associations  to create their own AI Personal Assistants — maximising personalised learning for coaches.

Why this matters

Coach educators Coach Developers  in Clubs and Associations face a unique challenge: supporting large numbers of coaches with limited time, resources, and capacity. Many want to offer personalised development but are constrained by admin, scheduling, and the scale of their work.

The AI Football Coach Educator Pathway provides a practical, hands-on journey that enables coach educators to design, build, and apply their own AI assistants. These assistants are not generic tools — they are personalised, context-specific, and directly aligned to the needs of their coaches. They are 'Conversational Assistants'  bespoke created specifically improve Knowledge but also improve Understanding and actually enhance practical coaching skills like communication , reflection and analysis 

By the end of the Pathway, participants will be able to:

  • Create and operate their own Chatbot based on their chosen content

  • Develop individualised learning programmes for their coaches

  • Provide round-the-clock support, resources, and feedback

  • Use AI to extend their impact far beyond what’s possible with traditional methods

Development of an AI Assistant to help coaches is more- much more - than the provision of an app with a range of games and practices. It provides the coach with their own Personal Assistant with whom they can engage in personal conversations which allows the AI Assistant to develop a profile of the coach's strengths and weaknesses. The coach can ask questions of the Assistant which they may be reluctant or embarrassed to ask their Coach Educator or Coach Developer. 

Common reservations — and how the Pathway addresses them

We understand that coach educators may feel cautious about using AI tools. The Pathway tackles these concerns directly:

  • Reliability of responses: Participants learn how to train, test, and refine their AI assistants to ensure accuracy and dependability.

  • Hallucinations (AI “making things up”): The Pathway teaches prompt design, precision instructions, and critical evaluation to ensure trustworthy and context-appropriate outputs.

  • Loss of control: AI enhances — not replaces — your expertise. You’ll learn how to use it as an extension of your professional judgement, helping you deliver more personalised support with full oversight.

By confronting these concerns openly, the Pathway helps coach educators integrate AI with confidence and clarity.

The impact on coach educators’ work

We have recently  completed a Pilot Pathway which included the following coach educators:

  • Derek Broadley – Technical Director, Charleston Soccer Club (USA); former Technical Director, Bermuda FA; Academy Director, Crystal Palace FC:

“ I was not really aware of AI and how it could be used prior to the course. That being said, I got inspired very quickly and once I got a bot up and running it got infectious. I loved testing it with the information I was training it with.  My goal is to have our BOTs fully functional for the 26/27 season for our club. Working with the other students is definitely a plus and seeing what they do via the communication process you set up was informative and did save me time”

Derek has created the AI Assistants ( bots) for the full range of coaches and parents at his club , mainly to provide simple knowledge exchange and to free his time up to deal with individually with coaches 

​ “The course was an eye opening experience into the world of AI and pairing this with coach development and education. Robin sets up an informative and engaging course and I would fully recommend it for those working with coaches across all age groups and levels.The most valuable part was the step by step guide provided for the candidates to follow to explore ChatGPT, create the bot and the ongoing process of feeding the bot and testing it to continue to refine it. The outcome has been excellent and with my job change I'll be exploring adding this concept to the coaches with my new club"

Chris developed the AI Assistant at his club principally to provide quick simple information for the large number of volunteer coaches at his previous Community Club 

​     

"I valued the exposure to the use of AI as a development tool and the option of additional support (calls/emails) as required " 

As an example of the use of AI in critical thinking .......The Arsenal Youth Academy has a philosophy of developing young players who take responsibility for their own learning and thus similarly want to support the development of coaches who take ownership  for their own development.Matthew's initial work with AI has therefore been on improving the critical thinking and reflection skills of the coaches for which he is responsible 

  • Ray Atteveld – Former English Premier League and Eredivisie player; experienced coach in the Netherlands, Ukraine, and Israel; currently completing his role as Technical Director of the FA of Kazakhstan:

“The course was both interesting and challenging. I always looked forward to our meetings — your positive approach kept us motivated. You pushed us to try new things, and I’m grateful for the eye-opening insights you provided.”

  • Professor Masao Nakayama:   Professor, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan  and  also a National Coach at the JFA National Training Centre  

 

" I would like to tell anyone who seems interested about the new course that it  was important to experience the process of creating my own bot through these sessions.I learned the basics of creating my own bot during this session and new functions were introduced , which allowed me to try new things.I really do believe that AI has the potential to help football coaches and those who teach them." 

Other examples of AI Personal Assistants we have developed include :

      with UEFA and FIFA disability football expert Jeff Davis )

      Willi Hink,the former Director of Amateur Football for the German FA ( DFB)

​​​​​​​​​​​

The value of the Pathway

  • Personalised learning at scale – Coach educators can design bespoke learning journeys for each coach. This can mean increased access for those with limited time or money to attend courses or deeper ongoing assistance with coaches already committed to coaching

  • Enhanced efficiency – By automating repetitive tasks educators free up more time to focus on high-value, human interactions with coaches.

  • Better engagement and retention – Coaches receive support that feels tailored and relevant to their own journey. This not only increases motivation but also reduces dropout rates.

  • Professional credibility – Coach educators become pioneers in integrating AI into sport, equipping themselves with future-proof skills that are increasingly in demand worldwide.

Why a “Pathway” — not a “Course”?

Unlike typical short courses, this is a guided, vocational experience combining:

  • Structured learning and feedback

  • Self Paced Progression 

  • Collaborative, shared practice with other coach educators developing their AI Personal Assistants 

  • Ongoing community support

  • Real-world application in live coach education contexts

The focus is on applied learning, professional growth, and tangible results.

Who is it for?

The Pathway is designed for football leaders who want to enhance coach education and development within their clubs, academies, or national associations — including those who aim to:

  • Create tailored learning programmes for individual coaches

  • Support remote learners with limited access to in-person courses

  • Provide CPD and continuing education opportunities

The November 2025 Cohort is limited to the first 12 participants to enrol .

Outcomes

By completing the Pathway, participants will:

  • Identify Needs: Analyse specific coaching needs that AI can address

  • Build Tools: Create customised AI assistants for their own organisations

  • Test & Evaluate: Ensure tools are safe, reliable, and trusted

  • Apply Methodology: Use AI to improve knowledge, deepen understanding, and enhance communication, planning, and evaluation skills

  • Develop Prompts: Build a tailored “Prompt Pack” for your coaching context

  • Produce Resources: Generate customised digital content (presentations, e-books, guides)

  • Create AI Agents: Monitor and optimise your bots

  • Leverage Media: Integrate data, voice, and gamification to engage coaches

  • Extend Use: Apply AI tools for players (13+) and parents

  • Strategise: Develop a plan to embed AI in your education programmes

  • Monetise: Turn your AI creations into professional assets

  • Guide Others: Produce a personal guide to help others develop their own assistants

Delivery Format

The Pathway combines live workshops, guided practice, and ongoing community support over six months (approx. two hours per week):

  • Pre-Course Induction: “The AI Coach Educator’s Starter Kit”

  • Workshops: A Minimum of 6× 60-minute live sessions via Zoom (recorded for replay)

    • Cohort 1- First session: Friday, November 7th, 4pm UK time

    • Cohort 1- Second session: Friday, November 14th, 4pm UK time

  • Study Guides: 10 resources covering key AI skills for coach educators

  • Check-ins: 3 one-to-one consultations

  • Tools: Primarily ChatGPT and Google NotebookLM — these are the most used public facing AI tools but  the principles outlined in the Pathway will apply across all major AI platforms. In using Chat GPT it will be necessary to have a Cha tGPT Plus account for the duration of the Pathway  (£19/month) This would also include access to  the video creator Sora 

  • Support:

    • Continuous email guidance

    • Drop-in “AI surgery” sessions

    • Reflection prompts & worksheets

    • Peer learning community

Participants will also develop a Personal Portfolio to capture their progress and guide future use of AI in coach education.

All successful participants receive a Certificate of Completion.

Why Sports Path?

With decades of experience delivering digital learning in football worldwide, Sports Path brings credibility, expertise, and proven results.

Our projects include:

  • Founding FA Learning Ltd and the first English FA online coach education courses

  • Partnering on the LMA School of Football and the UEFA Coaches Extranet 

  • Publishing Soccer Coaching and the Web (Part 1 and Part 2

The AI Football Coach Educator Pathway builds on this foundation — combining innovation with experience.

We will be showcasing the use of Google Notebook LM as part of the Pathway and we have created a Google Notebook LM here regarding the Pathway 

Enrolment and Cost

Cohort 1 start: November 2025
Limited to 12 participants

Programme cost:

  • £299 (GBP)

  • $399 (USD)

  • €340 (EUR)

(20% early enrolment discount applies before October 31st — regular price $499 USD)

To enrol, follow the link HERE  for the secure WIX Payment System ( All Credit, Debit Cards and PayPal accepted ) 

For any questions, please contact:
📧 Robin Russell (Programme Director)

& George Hockey (Programme Coordinator)
📩 sportspathteam@gmail.com

​​​

bottom of page