top of page
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter

List of Prompts and Responses for Part 4 : Case Study - How to simple use ChatGPT to increase the number of registered players

NB Videos and Graphics at the bottom of this post


Prompt 1 : What is the most effective way to assess RAE in the registered players in my club or Association ?

Answer :

To effectively assess Relative Age Effect (RAE) in the registered players of your club or association, you should follow these steps:

1. Collect Birth Data: Gather accurate birthdate information for all registered players. This data is crucial for analyzing the distribution of birth months and quarters among the players.

2. Categorize by Birth Quarters: Divide the players into four groups based on their birth quarters within the selection year (e.g., Q1: Jan-Mar, Q2: Apr-Jun, Q3: Jul-Sep, Q4: Oct-Dec). This helps to identify any disproportions in the distribution.

3. Analyze Distribution: Compare the number of players in each quarter. A balanced distribution suggests minimal RAE, while a significant skew towards earlier quarters indicates a strong RAE.

4. Consider Age Groups: Analyze each age group separately. RAE can vary across different age categories.

5. Review Historical Trends: If possible, examine past seasons’ data to identify any ongoing trends or changes in RAE within your club or association.

6. Benchmark with Larger Data Sets: If available, compare your findings with regional or national data to understand how your club's RAE compares to broader trends.

7. Incorporate Contextual Factors: Remember that RAE is influenced by various factors, including coaching practices, selection policies, and player development approaches. These should be considered when interpreting the data.

8. Regular Assessment: Make this analysis a regular part of your player development and selection review process to continually monitor and address RAE.

By following these steps, you can gain a clear understanding of RAE within your club or association and take informed steps to mitigate its impact.



Prompt 2: How would you recommend I analyse the distribution of ages quickly and effectively ?

Answer :

For a quick and effective analysis of the age distribution in your club or association, which is essential for understanding Relative Age Effect (RAE), I recommend the following steps:

1. Use a Spreadsheet Program: Input the birthdate data of all players into a spreadsheet program like Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets. This allows for easy manipulation and analysis of data.

2. Calculate Age and Birth Quarter: Add a column to calculate each player's age and another to determine their birth quarter (Q1: Jan-Mar, Q2: Apr-Jun, Q3: Jul-Sep, Q4: Oct-Dec).

3. Sort by Birth Quarter: Sort the data by birth quarter or month. This visually highlights the distribution and makes it easier to spot any imbalances.

4. Create a Pivot Table: Utilize a pivot table to summarize the data. This can show the number of players in each birth quarter or month, providing a clear view of the distribution.

5. Visualize with Charts: Generate charts (like bar charts or pie charts) from the pivot table data. Visual representations can more effectively communicate the distribution pattern and any skew towards particular quarters.

6. Compare Across Age Groups: Conduct this analysis separately for each age group to identify if RAE varies across different levels.

7. Review Regularly: Make this a regular practice to monitor changes over time and assess the effectiveness of any interventions you implement to address RAE.

By following these steps, you can quickly analyze the age distribution among your players, which is crucial for understanding and addressing RAE in your club or association.


Prompt 3 : Will RAE decrease over time and provide an even distribution or will it maintain into adult football ?

Answer :

The evolution of Relative Age Effect (RAE) from youth to adult football is a subject of ongoing research and debate. Generally, the impact of RAE tends to decrease over time, but it does not completely vanish. Here's a brief overview:

1. Decrease Over Time: As players mature, the physical and developmental differences that give early-born players an advantage in youth football diminish. This can lead to a reduction in the RAE as players reach adulthood.

2. Persistence in Elite Levels: However, RAE may persist, especially at elite levels of adult football. This is partly because early-born players, who were initially advantaged, often receive better training, more playtime, and greater development opportunities during critical growth periods.

3. Selection and Dropout Rates: The selection biases and higher dropout rates among late-born players in youth football can lead to a self-perpetuating cycle, where those initially advantaged continue to dominate squads in adult football.

4. Varies by Context: The extent to which RAE diminishes or persists can vary based on the country, the level of competition, and the specific policies of football clubs and associations.

5. Interventions Matter: Clubs and associations that actively work to mitigate RAE (e.g., through adjusted selection criteria, age group banding, or focused training for later-born players) may see a more significant decrease in its impact over time.

In summary, while there is a trend towards a decrease in RAE from youth to adult football, it does not typically result in a completely even distribution, especially at higher levels of play. Continuous efforts and targeted strategies are necessary to further mitigate its impact.


Prompt 4: Are Early born ( Quarter 1 ) birthdates generally bigger than Late Born ( Quarter 4 ) birthdates ? Please provide references for your response


Answer

The relationship between Relative Age Effect (RAE) and physical size differences between early and late-born players in football is nuanced. Contrary to common belief, a study found no significant differences in physical measures such as height and weight across different birth quarters in young male soccer players. Instead, the study highlighted that maturity, rather than relative age, has a greater association with physical performance. This indicates that early maturers, regardless of their birth quarter, tend to perform better in physical measures compared to their peers who mature later. It's important for practitioners to monitor and assess biological maturation in young soccer players to control its influence on physical performance and avoid biases in player selection based on absolute performance rather than talent .

Ref: Radnor, J. M., Staines, J., Bevan, J., Cumming, S. P., Kelly, A. L., Lloyd, R. S., & Oliver, J. L. (2021). Maturity Has a Greater Association than Relative Age with Physical Performance in English Male Academy Soccer Players. Sports, 9(12), 171. DOI: 10.3390/sports9120171.


Prompt : 5 How does RAE effect the recruitment of players at early ages ? Are clubs and Associations missing out on attracting players with Quarter 4 birthdates?

Answer :

Here's a summary of the key findings from the study "Inevitable Relative Age Effects in Different Stages of the Selection Process among Male and Female Youth Soccer Players":

1. Persistence of RAE in Selections: Despite efforts to reduce RAE by ensuring a mix of birthdates in team selections, early-born boys and girls (born in the first half of the year) are more likely to be selected in all stages of the process.

2. Increase with Competition Intensity: As the selection process progresses and becomes more competitive, adherence to the distribution criterion (60/40 split for first/last half of the year) diminishes, resulting in a higher RAE in the final stages.

3. No Significant Gender Differences: The study found no notable gender differences in RAE at any stage of the selection process, indicating that RAE impacts both male and female players similarly.


References :

"Relative Age and Dropout in French Male Soccer" by Nicolas Delorme, Julie Boiché, and Michel Raspaud:




Prompt 6 : In the overall research on this topic is there any difference recorded between boys and girls ?

Answer


The overall research on the topic of Relative Age Effect (RAE) indicates some differences between boys and girls:

  1. Presence in Both Genders: RAE is present in both male and female sports contexts, affecting the selection and performance opportunities for young athletes. However, the magnitude and impact of RAE can vary between genders.

  2. Moderating Factors: In female sports, the RAE is influenced by several interacting constraints. These include the level of competition, the age of athletes, and the type of sport. In sports with fewer female participants and where selections start later, the RAE tends to be weaker. Additionally, physical differences among girls are generally smaller compared to boys, and girls reach puberty earlier, which means the largest differences due to RAE might not coincide with the timing of strictest selection regimes.

  3. Variation Across Sports and Age Groups: In sports where physical characteristics are less important, the RAE is less prominent or even absent in both genders. For example, in sports where being smaller is advantageous, such as dance or horse racing, there's a reversal of the RAE, favoring later-born athletes. This reversal, however, is part of the same RAE mechanism. The RAE is observed at all levels in soccer, one of the sports with a significant presence of the effect, but its strength varies across different age groups and is generally stronger in younger athletes.

In conclusion, while RAE is a common phenomenon in youth sports affecting both genders, its impact and manifestation can differ based on the sport's nature, the age and developmental stage of the athletes, and the gender-specific physiological and social factors

References

  1. "Inevitable Relative Age Effects in Different Stages of the Selection Process among Male and Female Youth Soccer Players". This study examines the RAE in youth soccer, highlighting its presence in both male and female athletes throughout various stages of the selection process. It underscores the persistence of RAE despite efforts to reduce its impact in selections.

  • Reference: Lagestad, P., Steen, I., & Dalen, T. (2018). Inevitable Relative Age Effects in Different Stages of the Selection Process among Male and Female Youth Soccer Players. Sports, 6(2), 29. DOI.

  1. "Variations in the Relative Age Effect with Age and Sex, and Over Time—Elite-level Data from International Soccer World Cups". This research provides a comprehensive analysis of the RAE in international soccer, examining its variations across age, sex, and over time, offering insights into how the RAE operates differently in male and female soccer at various competitive levels.

  1. "Relative Age Effects Across and Within Female Sport Contexts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". This systematic review and meta-analysis study focuses on the prevalence and magnitude of RAE in female sports, including soccer. It offers a broad perspective on how RAE affects female athletes in soccer and other sports.

  • Reference: Smith, K. L., Weir, P. L., Till, K., Romann, M., & Cobley, S. (2018). Relative Age Effects Across and Within Female Sport Contexts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine, 48(8), 1989-1990. PubMed.

Prompt 7 : Roughly speaking what % of players are Clubs and Associations missing out on by not addressing RAE ?

Answer :

The percentage of players that clubs and associations may be missing out on due to not addressing the Relative Age Effect (RAE) can vary significantly depending on several factors, including the sport, the level of competition, and the effectiveness of interventions. Roughly speaking, studies have suggested that RAE can lead to clubs and associations missing out on anywhere from 15% to 30% or more of potential talent in youth sports.


Summarised in a diagram below from ChatGPT


ree

Prompt 9 : Can you create a short video to explain the above to coaches ?


Answer -




Prompt 10 : Can you provide for Clubs and Associations simple ideas to increase the number of Quarter 1 players they recruit and retain these players ?

Answer :

  1. Implement Age-Ordered Numbering: Use age-ordered shirt numbering in tryouts and training, as this can reduce age-related biases, helping scouts and coaches to focus on skills rather than age.

  2. Adjust Evaluation Criteria: Modify talent identification criteria to focus more on potential rather than current physical advantages. This can help in recognizing the abilities of younger players within the same age group.

  3. Educational Workshops: Conduct workshops for coaches and scouts about the Relative Age Effect, emphasizing the importance of identifying and supporting younger talent.

  4. Balanced Team Formation: Form teams with a balanced distribution of birth months. This ensures equal opportunities for all players and reduces the impact of RAE.

  5. Monitor and Support: Regularly monitor the development of Q1 players and provide additional support where needed, like skill development programs or mentoring.

  6. Promote Inclusivity: Foster an inclusive environment that values and encourages players born later in the selection year.

Prompt 11 : Can you summarise these ideas to give me in a diagram please ?


Answer


ree

Prompt 11 : Can you summarise these ideas to give me in a video please ?


Answer



 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


The AI Football Coach Educator Pathway

A structured route for Coach Educators and Coach Developers  in Clubs and Associations  to create their own AI Personal Assistants — maximising personalised learning for coaches.

Why this matters

Coach educators Coach Developers  in Clubs and Associations face a unique challenge: supporting large numbers of coaches with limited time, resources, and capacity. Many want to offer personalised development but are constrained by admin, scheduling, and the scale of their work.

The AI Football Coach Educator Pathway provides a practical, hands-on journey that enables coach educators to design, build, and apply their own AI assistants. These assistants are not generic tools — they are personalised, context-specific, and directly aligned to the needs of their coaches. They are 'Conversational Assistants'  bespoke created specifically improve Knowledge but also improve Understanding and actually enhance practical coaching skills like communication , reflection and analysis 

By the end of the Pathway, participants will be able to:

  • Create and operate their own Chatbot based on their chosen content

  • Develop individualised learning programmes for their coaches

  • Provide round-the-clock support, resources, and feedback

  • Use AI to extend their impact far beyond what’s possible with traditional methods

Development of an AI Assistant to help coaches is more- much more - than the provision of an app with a range of games and practices. It provides the coach with their own Personal Assistant with whom they can engage in personal conversations which allows the AI Assistant to develop a profile of the coach's strengths and weaknesses. The coach can ask questions of the Assistant which they may be reluctant or embarrassed to ask their Coach Educator or Coach Developer. 

Common reservations — and how the Pathway addresses them

We understand that coach educators may feel cautious about using AI tools. The Pathway tackles these concerns directly:

  • Reliability of responses: Participants learn how to train, test, and refine their AI assistants to ensure accuracy and dependability.

  • Hallucinations (AI “making things up”): The Pathway teaches prompt design, precision instructions, and critical evaluation to ensure trustworthy and context-appropriate outputs.

  • Loss of control: AI enhances — not replaces — your expertise. You’ll learn how to use it as an extension of your professional judgement, helping you deliver more personalised support with full oversight.

By confronting these concerns openly, the Pathway helps coach educators integrate AI with confidence and clarity.

The impact on coach educators’ work

We have recently  completed a Pilot Pathway which included the following coach educators:

  • Derek Broadley – Technical Director, Charleston Soccer Club (USA); former Technical Director, Bermuda FA; Academy Director, Crystal Palace FC:

“ I was not really aware of AI and how it could be used prior to the course. That being said, I got inspired very quickly and once I got a bot up and running it got infectious. I loved testing it with the information I was training it with.  My goal is to have our BOTs fully functional for the 26/27 season for our club. Working with the other students is definitely a plus and seeing what they do via the communication process you set up was informative and did save me time”

Derek has created the AI Assistants ( bots) for the full range of coaches and parents at his club , mainly to provide simple knowledge exchange and to free his time up to deal with individually with coaches 

​ “The course was an eye opening experience into the world of AI and pairing this with coach development and education. Robin sets up an informative and engaging course and I would fully recommend it for those working with coaches across all age groups and levels.The most valuable part was the step by step guide provided for the candidates to follow to explore ChatGPT, create the bot and the ongoing process of feeding the bot and testing it to continue to refine it. The outcome has been excellent and with my job change I'll be exploring adding this concept to the coaches with my new club"

Chris developed the AI Assistant at his club principally to provide quick simple information for the large number of volunteer coaches at his previous Community Club 

​     

"I valued the exposure to the use of AI as a development tool and the option of additional support (calls/emails) as required " 

As an example of the use of AI in critical thinking .......The Arsenal Youth Academy has a philosophy of developing young players who take responsibility for their own learning and thus similarly want to support the development of coaches who take ownership  for their own development.Matthew's initial work with AI has therefore been on improving the critical thinking and reflection skills of the coaches for which he is responsible 

  • Ray Atteveld – Former English Premier League and Eredivisie player; experienced coach in the Netherlands, Ukraine, and Israel; currently completing his role as Technical Director of the FA of Kazakhstan:

“The course was both interesting and challenging. I always looked forward to our meetings — your positive approach kept us motivated. You pushed us to try new things, and I’m grateful for the eye-opening insights you provided.”

  • Professor Masao Nakayama:   Professor, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan  and  also a National Coach at the JFA National Training Centre  

 

" I would like to tell anyone who seems interested about the new course that it  was important to experience the process of creating my own bot through these sessions.I learned the basics of creating my own bot during this session and new functions were introduced , which allowed me to try new things.I really do believe that AI has the potential to help football coaches and those who teach them." 

Other examples of AI Personal Assistants we have developed include :

      with UEFA and FIFA disability football expert Jeff Davis )

      Willi Hink,the former Director of Amateur Football for the German FA ( DFB)

​​​​​​​​​​​

The value of the Pathway

  • Personalised learning at scale – Coach educators can design bespoke learning journeys for each coach. This can mean increased access for those with limited time or money to attend courses or deeper ongoing assistance with coaches already committed to coaching

  • Enhanced efficiency – By automating repetitive tasks educators free up more time to focus on high-value, human interactions with coaches.

  • Better engagement and retention – Coaches receive support that feels tailored and relevant to their own journey. This not only increases motivation but also reduces dropout rates.

  • Professional credibility – Coach educators become pioneers in integrating AI into sport, equipping themselves with future-proof skills that are increasingly in demand worldwide.

Why a “Pathway” — not a “Course”?

Unlike typical short courses, this is a guided, vocational experience combining:

  • Structured learning and feedback

  • Self Paced Progression 

  • Collaborative, shared practice with other coach educators developing their AI Personal Assistants 

  • Ongoing community support

  • Real-world application in live coach education contexts

The focus is on applied learning, professional growth, and tangible results.

Who is it for?

The Pathway is designed for football leaders who want to enhance coach education and development within their clubs, academies, or national associations — including those who aim to:

  • Create tailored learning programmes for individual coaches

  • Support remote learners with limited access to in-person courses

  • Provide CPD and continuing education opportunities

Outcomes

By completing the Pathway, participants will:

  • Identify Needs: Analyse specific coaching needs that AI can address

  • Build Tools: Create customised AI assistants for their own organisations

  • Test & Evaluate: Ensure tools are safe, reliable, and trusted

  • Apply Methodology: Use AI to improve knowledge, deepen understanding, and enhance communication, planning, and evaluation skills

  • Develop Prompts: Build a tailored “Prompt Pack” for your coaching context

  • Produce Resources: Generate customised digital content (presentations, e-books, guides)

  • Create AI Agents: Monitor and optimise your bots

  • Leverage Media: Integrate data, voice, and gamification to engage coaches

  • Extend Use: Apply AI tools for players (13+) and parents

  • Strategise: Develop a plan to embed AI in your education programmes

  • Monetise: Turn your AI creations into professional assets

  • Guide Others: Produce a personal guide to help others develop their own assistants

 The Programme for the Cohort which began on November 7 2025 is the PDF adjacent  

Delivery Format

The Pathway combines live workshops, guided practice, and ongoing community support over six months (approx. two hours per week):

  • Pre-Course Induction: “The AI Coach Educator’s Starter Kit”

  • Workshops: A Minimum of 6× 60-minute live sessions via Zoom (recorded for replay)​

  • Study Guides: 10 resources covering key AI skills for coach educators

  • Check-ins: 3 one-to-one consultations

  • Tools: Primarily ChatGPT and Google NotebookLM — these are the most used public facing AI tools but  the principles outlined in the Pathway will apply across all major AI platforms. In using Chat GPT it will be necessary to have a Cha tGPT Plus account for the duration of the Pathway  (£19/month) This would also include access to  the video creator Sora 

  • Support:

    • Continuous email guidance

    • Drop-in “AI surgery” sessions

    • Reflection prompts & worksheets

    • Peer learning community

Participants will also develop a Personal Portfolio to capture their progress and guide future use of AI in coach education.

All successful participants receive a Certificate of Completion.

Why Sports Path?

With decades of experience delivering digital learning in football worldwide, Sports Path brings credibility, expertise, and proven results.

Our projects include:

  • Founding FA Learning Ltd and the first English FA online coach education courses

  • Partnering on the LMA School of Football and the UEFA Coaches Extranet 

  • Publishing Soccer Coaching and the Web (Part 1 and Part 2

The AI Football Coach Educator Pathway builds on this foundation — combining innovation with experience.

We will be showcasing the use of Google Notebook LM as part of the Pathway and we have created a Google Notebook LM here regarding the Pathway 

Enrolment and Cost

The November 2025 Cohort is now Full 
The next Cohort will start in February /March 2026
Cost : $495 / €425/ £375
If you would like details of the next Cohort beginning in February/ March 2025 please leave your name and email here 

 

For any questions, please contact:
📧 Robin Russell (Programme Director)

& George Hockey (Programme Coordinator)
📩 sportspathteam@gmail.com

​​​

bottom of page